![texas sharpshooter fallacy examples texas sharpshooter fallacy examples](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PniicEqWhYQ/hqdefault.jpg)
The way this statement is worded follows the form we looked at earlier, making it easy to spot as being a middle ground fallacy. Therefore, it must be ok to lie sometimes. For instance, the Nostradamus lines that supposedly predicted 9/11 were taken from three separate and unrelated passages and a fictional line was added. Examples of Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy in Politics: A politician’s voting record is analyzed, and they are found to have voted for a bill that was passed with bipartisan support. One of my friends told me that lying is never acceptable, while another friend said it’s actually alright to lie whenever you want to. Nostradamus' quatrains are often liberally translated from the original (archaic) French, stripped of their historical context, and then applied to support the conclusion that Nostradamus predicted a given modern-day event, after the event actually occurred. This fallacy is often found in modern-day interpretations of the quatrains of Nostradamus.Attempts to find cryptograms in the Bible, and the Quran Code.This could be explained as an example of the fallacy because passages which do not match the algorithm have not been accounted for. There are some areas where the number of cancer cases is unusually high, which in the past has lead people to assume that there must be a causal link, such as contamination of the water supply or air pollution. Attempts to find cryptograms in the works of William Shakespeare, which tended to report results only for those passages of Shakespeare for which the proposed decoding algorithm produced an intelligible result. One typical example of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy is the existence of cancer clusters.Subsequent studies failed to show any links between power lines and childhood leukemia, neither in causation nor even in correlation. over 800, was so large that it created a high probability that at least one ailment would exhibit statistically significant difference just by chance alone. The problem with the conclusion, however, was that the number of potential ailments, i.e. The study found that the incidence of childhood leukemia was four times higher among those that lived closest to the power lines, and it spurred calls to action by the Swedish government. The researchers surveyed everyone living within 300 meters of high-voltage power lines over a 25-year period and looked for statistically significant increases in rates of over 800 ailments. A Swedish study in 1992 tried to determine whether or not power lines caused some kind of poor health effects.